Supreme Court· 1/27/1986

Thomas v. Arn

Citations

474 U.S. 140
106 S. Ct. 466
88 L. Ed. 2d 435
1985 U.S. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the de novo standard of review applies to both a factual and legal conclusions to which a party objects
holding that a failure to file objections to a magistrate’s report and recommendation operates as a waiver of appellate review
holding that a failure to file objections to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of appellate review
holding that the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motion
holding that the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion
holding that the de novo standard of review applies to both factual and legal conclusions to which a party objects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, Burger, White, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Brennan, Blackmun, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

At least 1,551 cases in this archive cite this case. Too many to rank, so this is a sample of 20 of them, not the most cited.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Thomas v. Arn

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.