Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the absence of any objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the Court “need IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 17
• noting that the Court need not conduct a de novo review “in the absence of a timely filed objection”
• holding that in the absence of any objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the Court “need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation’”
• holding that in the absence of any objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the Court “need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation’”
• holding that in the absence of any objections to a Report and Recommendation, the Court “need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation’”
• holding that in the absence of any objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the Court “need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).