· 6/18/2003
Schmidt v. Johnstone
Citations
- 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10380
- 2003 WL 21545101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that where no objections were filed, the District Court had no 15 obligation to review the magistrate judge’s report
- concluding that where no objections were filed, the District Court had no 16 obligation to review the magistrate judge’s report
- concluding that where no objections were filed, the District Court had no 20 obligation to review the magistrate judge’s report
- concluding that where no objections were filed, the District Court had no 18 obligation to review the magistrate judge’s report
- concluding that where no objections were filed, the District Court had no 18 obligation to review the magistrate judge’s report
- concluding that where no objections were filed, the District Court had no 21 obligation to review the magistrate judge’s report
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Teilborg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.