Supreme Court· 10/13/1952
On Lee v. United States
Citations
- 343 U.S. 747
- 72 S. Ct. 967
- 96 L. Ed. 2d 1270
- 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2794
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Fourth Amendment did not protect a conversation the defendant had with a third-party that police listened to through a wire
- noting that testi- mony from witness receiving benefits from government “may raise serious questions of credibility”
- noting that testimony from witness receiving benefits from government “may raise serious questions of credibility”
- explaining that a trespass constitutes an unreasonable search if the officer gains entry “without any express or implied consent”
- stating that “[t]his Court has long recognized the ‘serious questions of credibility’ informers pose”
- holding that “no trespass was committed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson, Black, Douglas, Burton, Frankfurter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
451 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 28,671×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court· 1985-08-14· cited 3,810×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court· 2012-01-23· cited 1,330×
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 1,201×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,098×
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 983×
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court· 1979-04-13· cited 883×
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-04-27· cited 640×
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 639×
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 498×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 2,030×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1951-11-26· cited 1,320×
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1921-02-28· cited 1,256×
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1924-05-05· cited 1,214×
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-04-27· cited 507×
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-12-11· cited 406×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1937-12-20· cited 389×
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 353×
- Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-04-27· cited 228×
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals· 1903-11-15· cited 144×
- Nueslein v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1940-11-25· cited 122×
- McGuire v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 97×
- United States v. On LeeSecond Circuit· 1952-03-03· cited 56×
- Sparks v. Territory of OklahomaEighth Circuit· 1906-06-07· cited 10×
Other cases named On Lee v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.