Skip to main content
· 5/6/1991

Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 932 F.2d 505
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8487
  • 1991 WL 69209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a general objection to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation “has the same effects as would a failure to object”
  • providing that a general objection to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation “has the same effects as would a failure to object”
  • noting that when a party makes a general objection, “[t]he district court’s attention is not focused on any specific issues for review, thereby making the initial reference to the magistrate useless”
  • noting that when a party makes a general objection, “[t]he district court’s attention is not focused on any specific issues for review, thereby making the initial reference to the magistrate 6 In support, the Magistrate Judge also cited 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2
  • “A general objection to the entirety of the magistrate’s report has the same effect as would a failure to objection.”
  • “A general objection to the entirety of the magistrate’s report has the same effect as would a failure to objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Engel, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.