United States v. Nicholas Omar Midgette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that litigant “waives a right to appellate review of particular issues by failing to file timely objections specifically directed to those issues”
• holding that a litigant “waives a right to appellate review of particular issues by failing to file timely objections specifically directed to those issues”
• holding that a party “waives a right to appellate review of particular issues by failing to file timely objections specifically directed to those issues”
• holding that a litigant “waives a right to appellate review of particular issues by failing to file timely objections specifically directed to those issues”
• holding that a litigant “waives a right to appellate review of particular issues by failing to file timely objections specifically directed to those issues”
• holding that courts need not consider objections that are not sufficiently specific, such as “generalized objection[s]” that purport “to cover all 23 issues addressed by the magistrate judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).