Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 2/10/2009

Williams v. McNeil

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 1287
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2484
  • 2009 WL 311298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district judge has the discretion to decline to consider an argument raised for the first time in an objection
  • holding that a district judge has the discretion to decline to consider an argument raised for the first time in an objection
  • holding that a district court has discretion to decline to consider a party’s argument when that argument was not first presented to the magistrate judge
  • holding that a district court has discretion to decline to consider a party’s argument when that argument was not first presented to the magistrate judge
  • holding that “a district court has discretion to decline to consider a party’s argument when that argument was not first presented to the magistrate judge”
  • holding that a district judge has the discretion to decline to consider an argument raised for the first time in an objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Carnes, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.