Skip to main content
· 12/2/1991

Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States

Citations

  • 950 F.2d 656
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28159
  • 1991 WL 251582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se litigant must be informed that failure to object will, rather than may, bar appellate review of both legal and factual conclusions of magistrate judge
  • holding that waiver rule does not apply 1 Counsel twice requested a “two (3
  • noting that firm waiver rule “need not be 3 applied when the interests of justice so dictate”
  • holding waiver applicable to pro se litigant only when magistrate judge has informed litigant of consequences of failure to object
  • stating that the waiver rule as a procedural bar need not be applied “when the interests of justice so dictate”
  • holding waiver applicable to pro se litigant only when magistrate has informed litigant of consequences of failure to object, unless ends of justice dictate otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Logan, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.