Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/13/1981
State v. Garcia
Citations
- 302 N.W.2d 643
- 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that even if mitigating factors are present, court is not required to depart
- upholding a sentencing departure because the trial court, while relying on a few improper factors, also based its decision on appropriate sentencing considerations and, therefore, did not clearly abuse its discretion
- affirming, dispositional departure because defendant was an “extremely poor candidate” for probation
- generally reviewing sentencing departures for a clear abuse of discretion
- overruled on other grounds by State v. Givens, 544 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 1996). “Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618, 623 (Minn. 2016
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sheran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-10-06· cited 124×
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 115×
- In re the Personal Restraint of BreedloveWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 102×
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 96×
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-30· cited 81×
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-30· cited 80×
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 76×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-11-06· cited 75×
- State v. Van RulerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-12-03· cited 73×
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-03-08· cited 64×
- Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 56×
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 50×
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-14· cited 47×
- State v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-07-11· cited 44×
- State v. PeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-26· cited 42×
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-17· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.