Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/13/2008

State v. Jones

Citations

745 N.W.2d 845
2008 Minn. LEXIS 118
2008 WL 681671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a defendant .is entitled to a jury determination of facts rel- . evant to an aggravated sentence
stating that post-Blakely, absent a waiver by a defendant, the fact-finder must determine facts that would justify an upward departure
explaining that when the district court’s reasons stated on the record for a departure are improper or inadequate, our past practice has been to independently review the record to determine whether sufficient evidence justifies a departure for legitimate reasons
listing the categories of facts available to district courts looking to depart upward
listing the categories of facts available to district courts looking to depart upward
recognizing exceptions to the statutory prohibition of cumulative punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Russell, Dietzen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.