Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/11/1982
State v. Olson
Citations
- 325 N.W.2d 13
- 1982 Minn. LEXIS 1805
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that sentencing “within the limits prescribed by the legislature is purely a judicial function”
- stating that “the legislature may restrict the exercise of judicial discretion in sentencing . . . by providing for mandatory sentences”
- stating that power to define criminal conduct and fix punishment is vested in the legislature, while “imposition of the sentence within the limits prescribed by the legislature is purely a judicial function”
- stating that imposing a sentence within legislative limits is “purely a judicial function”
- stating once the legislature has defined the range of punishments for a particular offense, it cannot “condition the imposition of the sentence by the court upon the prior approval of the prosecutor”
- stating once the legislature has defined the range of punishments for a particular offense, it cannot \condition the imposition of the sentence by the court upon the prior approval of the prosecutor\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-11· cited 229×
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 145×
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 142×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-10-06· cited 124×
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 115×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-01· cited 110×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-11-06· cited 75×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-25· cited 74×
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-01· cited 73×
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-12-06· cited 72×
- Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 70×
- State v. StrattonNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-09-20· cited 69×
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-23· cited 66×
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 64×
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-05-23· cited 63×
- Kaiser v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-04-18· cited 53×
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 50×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-06-15· cited 49×
- State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-11-17· cited 39×
- State v. AlvarezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-02-14· cited 39×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-09-01· cited 209×
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-23· cited 185×
- People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court· 1974-03-27· cited 180×
- Esteybar v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-06-22· cited 121×
- State v. LeCompteSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-11-16· cited 60×
- State v. OsterlohSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-12-22· cited 49×
- Head v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-12-09· cited 46×
- Lewis v. Legislative Body of 91st Congress of United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-10-19· cited 37×
- State v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-05-03· cited 28×
- State on Behalf of Forslund v. BronsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-01-16· cited 25×
- Erickson v. SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK ASSN., INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-03-24· cited 19×
- Grudnosky v. BislowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-03-07· cited 18×
- Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local No. 59 v. SpannausSupreme Court· 1971-10-19· cited 18×
- State v. JonasonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-03-11· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.