Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/8/1985
Williams v. State
Citations
- 361 N.W.2d 840
- 1985 Minn. LEXIS 988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that district court’s statements, read into record, regarding reasons for consecutive sentencing “will suffice as a departure report”
- stating that if sentencing court’s reasons for departure are improper or inadequate, the departure may be affirmed if there is sufficient evidence in the record to justify the departure
- resentencing form mentioned only for failure to list reasons for departure
- “If the reasons given are improper or inadequate and there is insufficient evidence of record to justify the departure, the departure will be reversed.”
- “If the reasons given are improper or inadequate and there is insufficient evidence of record to justify the departure, the departure will be reversed.”
- “If no reasons for departure are stated on the record at the time of sentencing, no departure will be allowed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-22· cited 135×
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 115×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 80×
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-10-23· cited 77×
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 76×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-11-06· cited 75×
- State v. GivensSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-03-08· cited 64×
- State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles SolbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-07-27· cited 57×
- State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-24· cited 53×
- State v. ForemanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-06-10· cited 49×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-13· cited 46×
- State v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-07-11· cited 44×
- Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-05-11· cited 43×
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-03-21· cited 37×
- State v. ChaklosSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-02-10· cited 36×
- State v. StankeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-05-07· cited 30×
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-28· cited 30×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-12-16· cited 29×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-07· cited 27×
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-11-26· cited 22×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-12· cited 27×
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 23×
- State v. NorthardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-04-24· cited 14×
- State v. GistSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-14· cited 10×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-06-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.