Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/29/2011
Tucker v. State
Citations
- 799 N.W.2d 583
- 2011 Minn. LEXIS 353
- 2011 WL 2555635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the failure to render aid is “relevant to whether a person convicted of a crime has acted in a particularly cruel manner”
- noting that an upward sentencing departure based on particular cruelty is not an abuse of the district court’s discretion when the cruelty is not usually associated 4 with the relevant offense
- explaining the “fundamental requirement” that upward departures are permitted “only when a defendant’s conduct in the commission of an offense is significantly more- serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense in question”
- relying on the word “particular” to conclude that the aggravating factor of “particular cruelty” toward the victim means cruelty “of a kind not usually associated with the commission of the offense in question” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Barry, Dietzen, Gildea, Stras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-22· cited 135×
- State of Minnesota v. Mo Savoy HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-06-03· cited 29×
- State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy FlemingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-09-08· cited 14×
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-09-17· cited 13×
- State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-17· cited 12×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-10-04· cited 11×
- State v. StempfleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-08-16· cited 5×
- State v. TurrubiatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-05-06· cited 1×
- State of Minnesota v. Curtis Lablanche VanengenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-03-06
- State of Minnesota v. Samantha Dana SchroederCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-10
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 115×
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-30· cited 81×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-11-06· cited 75×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-19· cited 62×
- State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 59×
- State v. DelkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-05-04· cited 57×
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-16· cited 47×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-13· cited 46×
- State v. StummSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-11-20· cited 45×
- State v. Ming Sen ShiueSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-03· cited 39×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-21· cited 32×
- State v. OttSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-06· cited 31×
- State v. TraylorSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-02-24· cited 28×
- State v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 24×
- State v. TraylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-03-26· cited 10×
- State v. LoryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-01-07· cited 9×
- State v. GurskeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-05-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.