Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/6/2005

State v. Shattuck

Citations

704 N.W.2d 131
2005 WL 1981659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a jury, rather than a court, must find aggravating factors in the commission of an offense
holding that a jury, rather than a court, must find aggravating factors in the commission of an offense
holding that, when a jury verdict on first-degree criminal sexual conduct and kidnapping exposed a defendant only to a presumptive sentence of 161 months, the district court’s finding of aggravating factors leading to an additional 30-year sentence violated the Sixth Amendment
stating that “this court has the authority to establish procedures to apply the requirements of Apprendi and Blakely to sentencing in Minnesota”
stating that \this court has the authority to establish procedures to apply the requirements of Apprendi and Blakely to sentencing in Minnesota\
explaining that the “statutory maximum” sentence referred to in Apprendi and Blakely is the maximum sentence that a judge may impose without additional findings, i.e., the top of the guidelines range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.