Skip to main content

Stoker v. State

Citations

  • 692 N.E.2d 1386
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 432
  • 1998 WL 159206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Indiana Constitution imposed no specific duty upon law enforcement officers to record or preserve custodial interrogations in places of detention
  • recommending that law enforcement adopt procedure to record interrogations
  • recommending that law enforcement adopt procedure to record interrogations
  • “[T]his court has previously concluded that the standard for evidence preservation under the Indiana Constitution is consistent with the federal analysis.”
  • state constitution does not require law enforcement officers to record custodial interrogations
  • strongly recommending policy of recording custodial interrogations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Kirsch, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.