Indiana Court of Appeals· 4/6/1998
Stoker v. State
Citations
- 692 N.E.2d 1386
- 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 432
- 1998 WL 159206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Indiana Constitution imposed no specific duty upon law enforcement officers to record or preserve custodial interrogations in places of detention
- recommending that law enforcement adopt procedure to record interrogations
- recommending that law enforcement adopt procedure to record interrogations
- “[T]his court has previously concluded that the standard for evidence preservation under the Indiana Constitution is consistent with the federal analysis.”
- state constitution does not require law enforcement officers to record custodial interrogations
- strongly recommending policy of recording custodial interrogations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Kirsch, Friedlander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GodseyTennessee Supreme Court· 2001-11-29· cited 198×
- Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-08-16· cited 167×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-05-10· cited 94×
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-12· cited 68×
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-09-25· cited 52×
- Whitfield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-07-28· cited 30×
- Terry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-11-27· cited 28×
- Gasper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-09-06· cited 20×
- Dixon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-07-14· cited 14×
- State v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-08-18· cited 8×
- State v. CongerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-11-07· cited 6×
- Gregory S. Powers v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-12-27
- Larry Corneal Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-03-20
- State of Indiana v. Mitchell Jay BozarthIndiana Court of Appeals· 2025-12-01
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 183×
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 174×
- Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 136×
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 104×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-15· cited 95×
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-07-26· cited 82×
- State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-02-01· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. DiazMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-03-13· cited 68×
- State v. KekonaHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-12-05· cited 57×
- Jimenez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-06-07· cited 51×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-13· cited 42×
- State v. GortonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 41×
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-08-02· cited 32×
- Callis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-08-20· cited 32×
- State v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-12-11· cited 30×
- Rita v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 21×
- State v. WintersIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-04-04· cited 20×
- Rita v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-04-18· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.