Court of Appeals of Utah· 8/2/1993

State v. James

Citations

858 P.2d 1012
218 Utah Adv. Rep. 45
1993 Utah App. LEXIS 131
1993 WL 299678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Utah Constitution does not require electronic recording of custodial interrogations
explaining that the court denied the motion to suppress and then “later executed findings of fact submitted by counsel for the State”
holding defendant's post-Miranda confession admissible because it was not obtained by coercion, even though post-Mi-ramda confession followed initial unwarned admission
describing numerous reasons for recording interrogations, including avoiding unwarranted claims of coercion and coercive tactics by police
describing numerous reasons for recording interrogations, including avoiding unwarranted claims of coercion and coercive tactics by police
rejecting the defendant's argument \that the detectives' failure to record the interrogation verbatim violated his constitutional guarantee of due process under both the federal and state constitutions\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Garff, Greenwood, and Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.