Stephan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to record an interrogation is a violation of the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution
• holding that recording of custodial interrogation in place of detention must “clearly indicate” that it recounts entire interview
• holding that recording of custodial interrogation in place of detention must \clearly indicate\ that it recounts entire interview
• holding that under the due process clause of the state constitution the custodial interrogation of a suspect must be electronically recorded when recording is feasible
• holding that under the due process clause of the state constitution the custodial interrogation of a suspect must be electronically recorded when recording is feasible
• holding that non-recorded statements made during the course of a custodial interrogation should be suppressed because they were obtained in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Alaska Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).