Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 287 S.W.3d 567
  • 374 Ark. 292
  • 2008 Ark. LEXIS 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s claim that recording of custodial interrogation was constitutionally mandated but concluding that “criminal-justice system will be better served if [the court’s] supervisory authority is brought to bear on this issue”
  • no constitutional right to recordation under due process clause of state constitution
  • “[W]e believe that the criminal justice system will be better served if our supervisory authority is brought to bear on this issue. We therefore refer the practicability of adopting such a [recording] rule to the Committee on Criminal Practice for study and consideration.”
  • reviewing alleged jury-instruction error under an abuse-of-discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.