Skip to main content
· 8/20/1997

Callis v. State

Citations

  • 684 N.E.2d 233
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 1162
  • 1997 WL 473588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that exclusion of defense attorney from polygraph examination and post-testing interview did not violate defendant’s right to counsel
  • affirming voluntary manslaughter conviction because jury reasonably found defendant was acting under sudden heat when he shot his girlfriend after she threatened suicide and they quarreled about the state of their relationship
  • affirming voluntary manslaughter conviction because jury reasonably found defendant was acting under sudden heat when he shot his girlfriend after she threatened suicide and they quarreled about the state of their relationship
  • expert testimony about coercive police interrogation and false confessions in the particular case excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chezem, Darden, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.