Skip to main content

Whitfield v. State

Citations

  • 699 N.E.2d 666
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 1260
  • 1998 WL 424161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an argument raised for the first time on appeal is waived and will not be considered
  • concluding that a disabled pellet gun was a deadly weapon because it “was used in a threatening manner and placed the victims in fear”
  • holding that arguments raised for the first time on appeal are waived and will not be considered on appeal
  • noting that an argument raised for the first time on appeal is waived and will not be considered by appellate court
  • stating that whether sufficient evidence exists to establish that an object constitutes a deadly weapon “is determined by looking to whether the weapon had the actual ability to inflict serious injury”
  • stating that whether sufficient evidence exists to establish that an object constitutes a deadly weapon “is determined by looking to whether the weapon had the actual ability to inflict serious injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Najam, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.