Skip to main content
· 1/30/1991

Tennard v. State

Citations

  • 802 S.W.2d 678
  • 1990 WL 182416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the existence and results of polygraph examinations are inadmissible for all purposes on proper objection
  • holding that prompt limiting instruction given after a witness referred to the defendant’s prior prison time cured any error
  • holding that the existence and results of polygraph examinations are inadmissible for all purposes on proper objection
  • providing that any possible error after witness referred to the defendant’s prior prison time was cured by trial court’s instruction to disregard
  • noting that \[t]he existence and results of a polygraph examination are inadmissible for all purposes\
  • noting that “[t]he existence and results of a polygraph examination are inadmissible for all purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Berchelmann, Sturns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.