Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/5/1996
State v. Watts
Citations
- 467 S.E.2d 272
- 321 S.C. 158
- 1996 S.C. App. LEXIS 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant's claim that he was entitled to a mistrial was not preserved for review because he failed to obtain a ruling on the motion
- finding defendant waived any argument regarding his denial of a mistrial based on testimony implicating he had a prior record where defense counsel refused trial judges offer to strike the testimony or issue a curative instruction
- in rejecting trial courts offer to strike testimony or give curative instruction, appellant waived any complaint he had to challenged testimony; because the question had already been answered, a motion to strike was necessary to preserve any claim of error on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-10-03· cited 110×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 105×
- State v. KromahSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-01-23· cited 94×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 79×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
- Creighton v. Coligny Plaza Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-30· cited 34×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-08-11· cited 30×
- State v. BANTANCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-03-10· cited 29×
- United States v. Soterio HopeFourth Circuit· 2022-03-09· cited 24×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-23· cited 18×
- City of Columbia v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 4×
- State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-04-17· cited 1×
- State v. OrrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-08-11
- State v. DialSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-01-29
- State v. Olandio R. WorkmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2024-08-07
- State v. Marcus A. WigfallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2026-03-11
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-15· cited 141×
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 90×
- State v. GunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-09-23· cited 77×
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 69×
- State v. SchrockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-31· cited 61×
- State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-03· cited 55×
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-08-07· cited 47×
- State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 46×
- State v. TucknessSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-14· cited 45×
- Varnadore v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-16· cited 42×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-08-18· cited 33×
- Hutson v. Cummins Carolinas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-21· cited 30×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-08-12· cited 28×
- State v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-15· cited 27×
- State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-03-22· cited 26×
- State v. WingoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-03-04· cited 23×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-07-18· cited 23×
- State v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-21· cited 22×
- State v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-04-17· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.