Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/13/1993
State v. Prince
Citations
- 447 S.E.2d 177
- 316 S.C. 57
- 1993 S.C. LEXIS 227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is presumed that no change in common law is intended unless the Legislature explicitly indicates such an intention by language in the statute.” (citing Nuckolls v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 192 S.C. 156, 161, 5 S.E.2d 862, 864 (1939))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 76×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-28· cited 69×
- State v. CurrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-04· cited 69×
- State v. PinckneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 61×
- State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-05· cited 34×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 34×
- State v. HarryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-05· cited 32×
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-16· cited 31×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 28×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-18· cited 27×
- State v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-06-17· cited 24×
- State v. DicapuaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-23· cited 19×
- State v. HorneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-07· cited 18×
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-28· cited 18×
- Clearwater Trust v. BuntingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-06· cited 16×
- State v. BarrosoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-06-12· cited 16×
- State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-13· cited 13×
- State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-04-26· cited 13×
- Paul Mazzell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1996-07-01· cited 12×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-30· cited 11×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-13· cited 177×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-04-24· cited 85×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-07· cited 74×
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 69×
- State v. CroweSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-04-21· cited 55×
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-10· cited 46×
- State v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-11-13· cited 34×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-11-14· cited 34×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-11-03· cited 30×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 30×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-11-10· cited 28×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-13· cited 28×
- State v. MasseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-10-19· cited 28×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-02-29· cited 26×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-02-11· cited 24×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-08-10· cited 18×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-06-06· cited 18×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 16×
- State v. SuttlesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-04-19· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.