Skip to main content
· 3/3/1981

State v. Hiott

Citations

  • 276 S.E.2d 163
  • 276 S.C. 72
  • 1981 S.C. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating an issue raised on appeal but not argued in the brief is deemed abandoned and will not be considered by the appellate court
  • applying test in determining the admissibility of evidence of prior illegal drug use
  • stating all other grounds not argued or briefed are deemed abandoned on appeal
  • “The gravamen of a robbery charge is a taking from the person or immediate presence of another by violence or intimidation.”
  • “[T]he United States Supreme Court has recently shifted away from a ‘standing’ approach to an inquiry focusing directly on the substantive issue of whether the claimant possessed a ‘legitimate expectation of privacy’ in the area searched.”
  • “the United States Supreme Court has recently shifted away from a ‘standing’ approach to an inquiry focusing directly on the substantive issue of whether the claimant possessed a ‘legitimate expectation of privacy’ in the area searched.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Ness, Gregory, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.