· 3/3/1981
State v. Hiott
Citations
- 276 S.E.2d 163
- 276 S.C. 72
- 1981 S.C. LEXIS 319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating an issue raised on appeal but not argued in the brief is deemed abandoned and will not be considered by the appellate court
- applying test in determining the admissibility of evidence of prior illegal drug use
- stating all other grounds not argued or briefed are deemed abandoned on appeal
- “The gravamen of a robbery charge is a taking from the person or immediate presence of another by violence or intimidation.”
- “[T]he United States Supreme Court has recently shifted away from a ‘standing’ approach to an inquiry focusing directly on the substantive issue of whether the claimant possessed a ‘legitimate expectation of privacy’ in the area searched.”
- “the United States Supreme Court has recently shifted away from a ‘standing’ approach to an inquiry focusing directly on the substantive issue of whether the claimant possessed a ‘legitimate expectation of privacy’ in the area searched.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Ness, Gregory, Harwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.