Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/22/1983
State v. Prince
Citations
- 301 S.E.2d 471
- 279 S.C. 30
- 1983 S.C. LEXIS 259
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a mistrial must be dictated by manifest necessity before a plea of double jeopardy will be denied
- holding that a mistrial was not dictated by manifest necessity where the juiy requested to rehear more than two hours of testimony after deliberating for five and one-half hours
- the less than lucid test is whether the mistrial was dictated by manifest necessity or the ends of public justice, the latter being defined as the public’s interest in a fair trial designated to end in just judgment
- mistrial should not be granted except in cases of manifest necessity
- mistrial should not be granted except in cases of manifest necessity
- mistrial should not be granted except in cases of manifest necessity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Littlejohn, Lewis, Ness, Gregory, Harwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 92×
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-27· cited 61×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 47×
- State v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-23· cited 37×
- State v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 37×
- State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-05· cited 34×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 34×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 33×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 31×
- State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-31· cited 27×
- State v. RowlandsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-12-11· cited 23×
- Baum v. RushtonFourth Circuit· 2009-07-16· cited 21×
- State v. CarriganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-12· cited 19×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-13· cited 14×
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-13· cited 10×
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-13· cited 7×
- State v. BaumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-16· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.