Skip to main content

State v. Gill

Citations

  • 584 S.E.2d 432
  • 355 S.C. 234
  • 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the element of knowledge is not required in an indictment for the crime of distribution of crack cocaine
  • finding the “knowingly” element is not an essential element of distribution of crack cocaine and is not required to be alleged in the indictment to confer subject matter jurisdiction
  • finding in case decided before Gentry that crack cocaine indictment which did not list mens rea element of “knowingly” nevertheless was sufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction on the circuit court
  • listing elements for “distribution of crack cocaine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stilwell, Howard, Strom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.