Creighton v. Coligny Plaza Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \discovery abuse motions do not become moot when a case is terminated\
• staling because no objection was raised concerning the trial judge’s jury instruction in regard to contributory negligence, the issue was not preserved for appeal
• “[A] loss of consortium claim cannot arise if no tort is committed against the impaired spouse.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \[T]he determination of whether a party has a duty to exercise reasonable care for the benefit of another is a question of law for the court.\
• “The grant or denial of a new trial motion rests within the discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal unless the trial judge’s findings are wholly unsupported by the evidence or the conclusions reached are controlled by error of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).