Skip to main content

State v. Schrock

Citations

  • 322 S.E.2d 450
  • 283 S.C. 129
  • 1984 S.C. LEXIS 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a “trial judge should grant a directed verdict motion when the evidence merely raises a suspicion that the accused is guilty”
  • reversing denial of directed verdict and relying, in part, on lack of evidence placing defendant at the scene of the crime
  • stating the State has the burden of proving “the accused was at the scene of the crime when it happened and that he committed the criminal act”
  • noting the State has the burden of proving “the accused was at the scene of the crime when it happened and that he committed the criminal act”
  • stating the State has the burden of proving \the accused was at the scene of the crime when it happened and that he committed the criminal act\
  • directed verdict should have been granted where there was no substantial evidence establishing defendant's presence at scene of murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.