Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/18/1994

State v. Bryant

Citations

447 S.E.2d 852
316 S.C. 216
1994 S.C. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding to preserve an issue for appellate review, a party need not move to strike testimony In particular, Juror Wallingford (the African American juror
finding the trial judge should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant where there was no evidence he intended to damage the patrol car when he threw the officer into it
finding to preserve an issue for appellate review, a parly need not move to strike testimony which the trial court had already ruled was proper, as such a motion would have been futile
where the Court found that it would have been futile to move to strike testimony which the trial court had already ruled was proper
where judge admits testimony over objection, counsel is not required to make motion to strike in order to preserve issue for appeal
where judge admits testimony over objection, counsel is not required to make motion to strike in order to preserve issue for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finney, Chandler, Toal, Moore, Chart, Whetstone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.