Skip to main content

State v. Washington

Citations

  • 521 N.W.2d 35
  • 1994 WL 460459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that jury instructions are relevant to the analysis of misconduct
  • holding that references to a defendant’s nature were improper character comments
  • “Where the jury has acquitted the appellant of some counts, but convicted the appellant of others, we view the verdicts as an ‘indica[tion] that the members of the jury were not unduly inflamed.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gardebring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.