State v. Glaze
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4549
Syllabus
Appellant challenges the constitutionality of his indefinite sentences under the Reagan Tokes Act. As we have previously stated, R.C. 2929.144 does not violate the separation of powers doctrine or deprive appellant of his due process rights. Likewise, the law does not violate his right to a jury trial. Finally, because the Reagan Tokes Act is constitutional, appellant's attorney was not ineffective for failing to object in the trial court. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.