Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/3/2004
Ture v. State
Citations
- 681 N.W.2d 9
- 2004 Minn. LEXIS 312
- 2004 WL 1211624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the use of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ during closing argument . . . was an improper interjection of personal opinion into the argument”
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 131×
- State v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 107×
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-03-18· cited 84×
- State v. BlancheSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-26· cited 68×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-03-17· cited 53×
- State v. MortonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-04· cited 42×
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-10-24· cited 41×
- State v. HallmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-15· cited 36×
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-31· cited 34×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-04-23· cited 32×
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-03-09· cited 32×
- State v. McLeodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-11-17· cited 23×
- Nunn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-24· cited 14×
- State v. LeutschaftCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-01-13· cited 11×
- Francis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-05· cited 11×
- Wimbley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2009-06-02· cited 11×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-12-19· cited 10×
- State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-08-03· cited 5×
- State v. WelleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-05-27· cited 4×
- Vickla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-02-09· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×
- State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-12-18· cited 141×
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 127×
- State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-09-02· cited 72×
- State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-02-19· cited 70×
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-02-28· cited 69×
- Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-03· cited 67×
- State v. EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-08-09· cited 58×
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-16· cited 58×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-03· cited 53×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-08-26· cited 40×
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-02-16· cited 39×
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-01-21· cited 36×
- State v. DeBaereSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-10-12· cited 33×
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-05-01· cited 32×
- State v. ShannonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-27· cited 32×
- State v. BroulikSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-02-24· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.