Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/18/1984
State v. Brown
Citations
- 348 N.W.2d 743
- 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying credit \to time spent in jail in another state solely in connection with the offense of sentencing while awaiting extradition\
- applying credit \to time spent in jail in another state solely in connection with the offense of sentencing while awaiting extradition\
- remanding to give credit for time spent in Illinois jail when the district court found that time was spent in connection with Minnesota offense
- remanding to award credit for time spent in Illinois jail awaiting extradition on Minnesota charge when district court found that the Illinois time was in connection with the Minnesota charge
- “[C]arefully worded instructions by the trial court can ameliorate the effect of improper prosecutorial argument.”
- \[C]arefully worded instructions by the trial court can ameliorate the effect of improper prosecutorial argument.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-14· cited 347×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-30· cited 115×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-05-24· cited 89×
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 76×
- State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-30· cited 56×
- State v. GatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-08-03· cited 53×
- State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-30· cited 50×
- State v. LangleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-17· cited 43×
- State v. MontjoySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-12· cited 40×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-08-26· cited 40×
- Montanaro v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-09-07· cited 36×
- Flynn v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-05-15· cited 35×
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-01-25· cited 30×
- State v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-08· cited 28×
- State v. AarsvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-12· cited 26×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-15· cited 24×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-25· cited 22×
- State v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-01· cited 19×
- State v. DarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-07-25· cited 18×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-03· cited 17×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-05-10· cited 177×
- In Re WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-07-15· cited 52×
- United States v. Jackie PorterEighth Circuit· 1976-11-05· cited 34×
- State v. ThreinenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-07· cited 30×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 30×
- State v. MahlerArizona Supreme Court· 1981-03-17· cited 29×
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-08· cited 21×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-07-21· cited 13×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-08-13· cited 13×
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-14· cited 12×
- State v. EllertSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-01-16· cited 8×
- Escobedo v. OleiskySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-10-19· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. BortnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-09-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.