United States v. Luis Oscar Sarmiento-Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding trial court’s ruling that alleged coconspirator’s statement exculpating defendants was inadmissible because the statement was not sufficiently corroborated and alleged coconspirator had previously made false, statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).