Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 6/29/2004
State v. Tate
Citations
- 682 N.W.2d 169
- 18 A.L.R. 6th 895
- 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 730
- 2004 WL 1444848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Crawford is not implicated where declarant of hearsay statement was present at trial and subject to cross-examination
- where declarant subject to cross-examination at trial, Crawford does not apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Willis, Hudson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Tennessee v. Jessie DotsonTennessee Supreme Court· 2014-09-30· cited 179×
- State v. PierreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-31· cited 116×
- State v. CarothersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-01-26· cited 33×
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-07-15· cited 21×
- People v. BuenoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-05-20· cited 21×
- State v. RealCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-31· cited 13×
- State v. LasnetskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-05-17· cited 3×
- State of Minnesota v. Dean Aaron AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-06-08· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Rafael RealCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-31
- State of Tennessee v. Kevin Allen FlemingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-03-22
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-08· cited 202×
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-05-10· cited 177×
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-26· cited 133×
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-01-13· cited 97×
- State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-09-03· cited 94×
- State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-09· cited 94×
- State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-02-19· cited 70×
- State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-08-28· cited 61×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-08· cited 53×
- Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-07-24· cited 53×
- State v. OrtleppSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-15· cited 51×
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-10-18· cited 42×
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-16· cited 42×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-08-26· cited 40×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-01-05· cited 36×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-16· cited 28×
- City of St. Paul v. DiBucciSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-05-09· cited 21×
- State v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-02-03· cited 17×
- State v. DexterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.