Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/4/2001

State v. Schwartz

Citations

21 P.3d 1128
173 Or. App. 301
2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that “[t]his requirement serves the purpose of causing the parties to frame their arguments appropriately” and “helps to identify any differences that the parties may have regarding the proper scope of review”
examining circumstances to determine whether unlawful search led police to focus on or interview the defendant
stating that the “requirement serves the purpose of causing the parties to frame their arguments appropriately to the types of rulings being challenged. It also helps to identify any differences that the parties may have regarding the proper scope of review * * *.”
“Legislative facts are used to determine what the law is or should be, not to arrive at findings about the events relevant to the particular case.”
discussing subsections (2) and (3) of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.