Oregon Supreme Court· 1/30/2025

State v. Bowman

Citations

373 Or. 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[T]he prosecution’s explicit reliance on that hearsay assertion in closing argu- ment, persuades us that the prosecutor * * * believed the evi- dence was important to proving the case.”
“[T]he prosecution’s explicit reliance on [the erroneously admitted evidence] in closing argument, persuades us that the pros- ecutor * * * believed the evidence was important to proving the case.”
“Rule 703 does not exempt expert witnesses from the general pro- hibition against hearsay; an expert may not merely parrot the statement of another for its truth. And Rule 703 does not make hearsay admissible.” (Internal footnote omitted.)
“Rule 703 does not exempt expert witnesses from the general pro- hibition against hearsay; an expert may not merely parrot the statement of another for its truth. And Rule 703 does not make hearsay admissible.” (Internal footnote omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.