State v. Garrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exclusionary rule applies when a defen- dant establishes a minimum factual nexus between a viola- tion of his Article I, section 11, rights and statements made by the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-30

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Montez v. Czerniak
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-03-20· cited 170×
• Montez v. Czerniak
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-06-12· cited 134×
• Lichau v. Baldwin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 126×
• State v. Moore/Coen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-16· cited 38×
• State v. Prieto-Rubio
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-04-07· cited 31×
• State v. Jones
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-12-13· cited 29×
• State v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-10-13· cited 22×
• State v. Craigen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2023-01-19· cited 13×
• Jackson v. Franke
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-03-31· cited 8×
• State v. Lowell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 7×
• Hinton v. Hill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-29· cited 4×
• State v. Dalessio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-30· cited 1×
• State v. Garrett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-01-31· cited 1×