Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/1/1980

State v. Stewart

Citations

272 S.E.2d 628
275 S.C. 447
1980 S.C. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that section 17-25-50 must be read in conjunction with section 17-25-40, the predecessor to section 17-25-45
recognizing that section 17-25-50 must be read in conjunction with section 17-25-40, the predecessor to section 17-25-45
recognizing that section 17-25-50 must be read in conjunction with section 17-25-40, the predecessor to section 17-25-45
holding that a defendant was not entitled to notice prior to the application of a mandatory sentence under S.C.Code Ann. § 17-25-40 (1976) (repealed), the predecessor statute to section 17-25-45
recognizing that jury is to weigh identification testimony that has some questionable feature
finding witnesses voice identification of defendant was admissible as to the issue of the reliability of the in-court identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.