Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/11/1992

State v. Smith

Citations

415 S.E.2d 409
307 S.C. 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the burden was on the defendant to show that the delay was due to the neglect and willfulness of the State's prosecution
holding the burden was on the defendant to show the delay was due to the neglect and willfulness of the State's prosecution
holding the burden was on the defendant to show the delay was due to the neglect and willfulness of the State's prosecution
finding the appellant's \argument that he was prejudiced because his witnesses' memories faded also lack[ed] merit because the same disadvantage hampered the State\
indicating the burden is on the defendant to show that \delay was due to the neglect and willfulness of the State's prosecution\
rejecting the defendant's argument that witnesses' faded memories amounted to prejudice under a speedy trial analysis because the same disadvantage hampered the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Sanders, Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.