Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/1/1982
State v. Ford
Citations
- 296 S.E.2d 866
- 278 S.C. 384
- 1982 S.C. LEXIS 442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because [the eyewitness] was a victim as opposed to a mere passerby, his degree of attention was presumably acute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Lewis, Littlejohn, Gregory, Harwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 92×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-11· cited 82×
- State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 47×
- State v. ScipioSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-12· cited 21×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-04-03· cited 7×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-22· cited 6×
- In the Interest of RasheeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-05-11· cited 5×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AshSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 868×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-10-11· cited 85×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-08-06· cited 32×
- State v. GambrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-05· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.