Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/24/2003
State v. Brown
Citations
- 589 S.E.2d 781
- 356 S.C. 496
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that if an out-of-court identification is the result of unnecessarily suggestive police procedures, an in-court identification is inadmissible
- \An in court identification of an accused is inadmissible if a suggestive out-of-court identification procedure created a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Goolsby, Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- State v. CheeseboroSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 115×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 92×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-11· cited 82×
- State v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-10-02· cited 63×
- State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 47×
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-12-01· cited 42×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
- State v. HoyteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.