Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/11/2000
State v. Moore
Citations
- 540 S.E.2d 445
- 343 S.C. 282
- 2000 S.C. LEXIS 226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an in-court identification is inadmissible if a suggestive out-of-court identification created a substantial likelihood of misidentification, and that such inquiry entails consideration of the totality of the circumstances
- “An in-court identification of an accused is inadmissible if a suggestive out-of-court identification procedure created a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CheeseboroSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 115×
- State v. MarquezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-14· cited 66×
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 49×
- State v. TraylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-07-26· cited 40×
- State v. LivermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 39×
- STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-06-15· cited 26×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-11-24· cited 25×
- State v. McCordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-22· cited 20×
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-15· cited 17×
- State v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-04-30· cited 12×
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-06-26· cited 11×
- State v. HellerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-13· cited 8×
- State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-09-07· cited 6×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 3×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-02-18· cited 2×
- State v. RoachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 2×
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-06-10· cited 2×
- State v. HeywardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-02-14· cited 2×
- State v. HardinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-15· cited 2×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 92×
- Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-12-12· cited 49×
- Rot v. Manchester Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1977-02-28· cited 49×
- James T. Caver v. State of AlabamaFifth Circuit· 1976-09-02· cited 46×
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-12-01· cited 42×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
- Curtis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-09-11· cited 27×
- State v. GambrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-05· cited 24×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-27· cited 21×
- State v. CashSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-08· cited 15×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-01· cited 11×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 8×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-22· cited 6×
- In the Interest of RasheeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-05-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.