Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/20/2003
State v. Gordon
Citations
- 588 S.E.2d 105
- 356 S.C. 143
- 2003 S.C. LEXIS 253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying § 17-25-50 to crimes so closely connected as to be treated as one offense
- applying § 17-25-50 to crimes so closely connected as to be treated as one offense
- “[T]he court should not consider the particular clause being construed in isolation, but should read it in conjunction with the purpose of the whole statute and the policy of the law.”
- “[T]he court should not consider the particular clause being construed in isolation, but should read it in conjunction with the purpose of the whole statute and the policy of the law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Westbrook, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 57×
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 27×
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-09-14· cited 26×
- Hernandez-Zuniga v. TickleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-14· cited 24×
- South Carolina Uninsured Employer's Fund v. HouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-08-02· cited 14×
- State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-01· cited 13×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
- State v. HackettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-24· cited 8×
- Harden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-16· cited 8×
- State v. SosbeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-11-13· cited 6×
- State v. WoodySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-04-05· cited 5×
- Horry County v. ParbelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 3×
- Koon v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-03-26· cited 3×
- Waiters v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-05· cited 3×
- Walters v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-05
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 1,423×
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 584×
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 537×
- United States v. LoveFourth Circuit· 1985-07-03· cited 189×
- State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 91×
- Pinckney v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 88×
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-22· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. EysterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-18· cited 39×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
- State v. AmersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-03-22· cited 36×
- State v. HudginsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-24· cited 35×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-09· cited 29×
- Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-10-26· cited 29×
- Joseph v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
- State v. DasherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-08· cited 20×
- Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-09· cited 18×
- South Carolina Coastal Council v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-14· cited 16×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-03-22· cited 15×
- State v. BenjaminSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-07· cited 12×
- State v. One Coin-Operated Video Game MacHineSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-02-20· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.