Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/12/2001

State v. Jones

Citations

543 S.E.2d 541
344 S.C. 48
2001 S.C. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that defendant may be charged with separate robbery offenses when there is a threat to each person from whom property is taken
holding “two-strikes” law constitutional under separation of powers, cruel and unusual punishment, equal protection and ex post facto challenges
holding a Telfaire charge was unnecessary when the case did not involve a single witness identification
holding a Telfaire charge was unnecessary where the case did not involve a single witness identification and where, given the witnesses' degree of certainty, there appeared very little likelihood of mistaken identification
holding a Telf aire charge was unnecessary where the case did not involve a single witness identification and where, given the witnesses’ degree of certainty, there appeared very little likelihood of mistaken identification
holding the mandatory nature of section 17-25-45 does not violate the separation of powers doctrine in light of a prosecutor’s discretion to pursue triggering offenses or plea down the charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.