Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/7/2005
State v. Staten
Citations
- 610 S.E.2d 823
- 364 S.C. 7
- 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an issue relating to a jury charge is not preserved for appellate review unless a party either requested the charge and obtained a ruling or objected on specific grounds to the charge as given
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Beatty, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MattisonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-09· cited 108×
- State v. MusserSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-08-04· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-08-29· cited 89×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 82×
- State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court· 2006-01-11· cited 72×
- State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court· 2007-10-10· cited 62×
- Bray v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-09-22· cited 57×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
- State v. HemberttNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-05-20· cited 37×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-23· cited 33×
- State v. PreslarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-02· cited 33×
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-08-30· cited 25×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-21· cited 18×
- State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-31· cited 17×
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-02-05· cited 6×
- State v. StatenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 3×
- State v. RoachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 2×
- State Of Iowa Vs. Adam Donald MusserSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-08-04
Cites
94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 884×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-12-15· cited 441×
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerSixth Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 436×
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1980-10-24· cited 419×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- United States v. James Saget, Also Known as HeshSecond Circuit· 2004-07-28· cited 219×
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-07-19· cited 213×
- Horton v. AllenFirst Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 209×
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kevin Manfre, Appellant/cross-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 2004-06-21· cited 168×
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. KelseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 143×
- United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny LeeEighth Circuit· 2004-07-08· cited 141×
- State v. VaughtNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.