United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D.L. Graham, Also Known as Danny Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence defendant abused a girlfriend, assaulted his sister, and assaulted patients and inmates at facilities probative of future dangerousness
• holding that the USAM does not create substantive or procedural rights enforceable by others
• finding unfair prejudice did not outweigh probative value of future dangerousness evidence because “none of the evidence elicited ... was likely to inflame the jury as much as testimony about [the defendant’s] involvement in the murder”
• “the admis- sion of evidence of unadjudicated prior offenses at a capital sentencing hearing is constitutionally permissible and not inherently prejudicial”
• defendant did not have judicially enforceable rights in internal Department of Justice (DOJ) procedures, including death penalty protocol contained in the United States Attorneys’ Manual
• discussing the “very low barriers to the admission of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).