Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 424 S.E.2d 496
  • 309 S.C. 442
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence of defendant’s prior drug use should have been excluded where it was unrelated to the crimes of murder and armed robbery and was not contemporaneous with the victim’s murder
  • holding exclusion of defendant’s nephew’s prior inconsistent statement constituted reversible error
  • “The [improperly admitted] ‘prior cocaine use’ testimony was so destructive to [the defendant’s] character, hence her credibility, that it cannot be held harmless error or cumulative.”
  • admission of testimony about prior drug use which likely destroyed defendant’s credibility, in a case where witness credibility was crucial to jury’s determination of who and what to believe, could not be deemed harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Harwell, Finney, Moore, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.