· 4/30/1990
State v. Nathari
Citations
- 399 S.E.2d 597
- 303 S.C. 188
- 1990 S.C. App. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial judge has broad discretion in determining general range and extent of cross examination
- once a witness is qualified as an expert, any question regarding the adequacy of the expert’s knowledge goes to the weight of the testimony and not to its admissibility
- the trial court is vested with broad discretion in dealing with the propriety of the State’s argument; the granting of a mistrial based upon a prosecutor’s argument is largely discretionary with the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.