Skip to main content
· 4/30/1990

State v. Nathari

Citations

  • 399 S.E.2d 597
  • 303 S.C. 188
  • 1990 S.C. App. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial judge has broad discretion in determining general range and extent of cross examination
  • once a witness is qualified as an expert, any question regarding the adequacy of the expert’s knowledge goes to the weight of the testimony and not to its admissibility
  • the trial court is vested with broad discretion in dealing with the propriety of the State’s argument; the granting of a mistrial based upon a prosecutor’s argument is largely discretionary with the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.