Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/8/1999
State v. King
Citations
- 514 S.E.2d 578
- 334 S.C. 504
- 1999 S.C. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that appellant waived review by failing to object before the jury verdict
- declaring that record must support logical relevance between prior bad act and crime for which defendant is accused
- declaring that record must support logical relevance between prior bad act and crime for which defendant is accused
- declaring that record must support logical relevance between prior bad act and crime for which defendant is accused
- holding when a party has waived an issue by failing to make a timely objection, the issue may not preserved through a post-trial motion
- finding that a party cannot raise an evidentiary issue for the first time in a new trial motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-19· cited 100×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
- State v. WeaverlingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-25· cited 60×
- State v. MartucciCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-24· cited 54×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 52×
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 49×
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 48×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-08· cited 40×
- State v. GillianCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 34×
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-08-04· cited 33×
- State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-02-05· cited 33×
- State v. KirtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-17· cited 32×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-05-29· cited 32×
- State v. PaganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-01-12· cited 28×
- State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 23×
- State v. CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-14· cited 22×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 20×
- State v. MazowskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-02-15· cited 20×
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-03· cited 17×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Larry W. MastersFourth Circuit· 1980-05-22· cited 343×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 113×
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 75×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-29· cited 68×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 64×
- State v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 61×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-27· cited 60×
- McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-18· cited 48×
- State v. PenlandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-06· cited 25×
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 23×
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-04-24· cited 21×
- State v. BoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 20×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-30· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.