Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 514 S.E.2d 578
  • 334 S.C. 504
  • 1999 S.C. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellant waived review by failing to object before the jury verdict
  • declaring that record must support logical relevance between prior bad act and crime for which defendant is accused
  • declaring that record must support logical relevance between prior bad act and crime for which defendant is accused
  • declaring that record must support logical relevance between prior bad act and crime for which defendant is accused
  • holding when a party has waived an issue by failing to make a timely objection, the issue may not preserved through a post-trial motion
  • finding that a party cannot raise an evidentiary issue for the first time in a new trial motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Finney, Toal, Moore, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.